2004 Ford Econovan vs. 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud
To start off, 2004 Ford Econovan is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud weights approximately 816 kg more than 2004 Ford Econovan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Econovan | 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | |
| Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Econovan | Silver Cloud |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1960 |
| Body Type | Van | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1789 cc | 6230 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1296 kg | 2112 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 5490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 3070 mm |
