2004 Ford Econovan vs. 1962 BMW Isetta
To start off, 2004 Ford Econovan is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 BMW Isetta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 BMW Isetta would be higher. At 1,789 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford Econovan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Econovan (90 HP) has 77 more horse power than 1962 BMW Isetta. (13 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Econovan should accelerate faster than 1962 BMW Isetta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Econovan weights approximately 936 kg more than 1962 BMW Isetta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Econovan | 1962 BMW Isetta | |
| Make | Ford | BMW |
| Model | Econovan | Isetta |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1789 cc | 247 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 1 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | single |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 13 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1296 kg | 360 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 2300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 1510 mm |
