2004 Ford Econovan vs. 1962 Holden EK
To start off, 2004 Ford Econovan is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Econovan (90 HP) has 26 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Econovan should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Holden EK (164 Nm) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Econovan. (138 Nm). This means 1962 Holden EK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Econovan.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Econovan | 1962 Holden EK | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Econovan | EK |
Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1789 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 64 HP |
Torque | 138 Nm | 164 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |