2004 Ford Econovan vs. 1998 Rover Mini

To start off, 2004 Ford Econovan is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover Mini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover Mini would be higher. At 1,789 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford Econovan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Econovan (90 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1998 Rover Mini. (62 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Econovan should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover Mini. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Econovan weights approximately 600 kg more than 1998 Rover Mini. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 Ford Econovan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Econovan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Rover Mini, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Econovan (138 Nm) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover Mini. (94 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Econovan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover Mini.

Compare all specifications: