2004 Ford Econovan vs. 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR
To start off, 2004 Ford Econovan is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR would be higher. At 4,998 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Econovan weights approximately 296 kg more than 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Econovan | 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR | |
Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Econovan | CLK GTR |
Year Released | 2004 | 1999 |
Body Type | Van | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1789 cc | 4998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1296 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2680 mm |