2004 Ford Econovan vs. 2001 MG X20
To start off, 2004 Ford Econovan is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 MG X20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 MG X20 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 MG X20 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 MG X20 (177 HP) has 87 more horse power than 2004 Ford Econovan. (90 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 MG X20 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Econovan.
Because 2004 Ford Econovan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Econovan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 MG X20, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 MG X20 has automatic transmission and 2004 Ford Econovan has manual transmission. 2004 Ford Econovan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 MG X20 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Econovan | 2001 MG X20 | |
Make | Ford | MG |
Model | Econovan | X20 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1789 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 177 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |