2004 Ford Econovan vs. 2007 Nissan 1400
To start off, 2007 Nissan 1400 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Econovan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Econovan would be higher. At 1,789 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford Econovan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Econovan (90 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2007 Nissan 1400. (63 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Econovan should accelerate faster than 2007 Nissan 1400.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Econovan (138 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Nissan 1400. (97 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Econovan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Nissan 1400.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Econovan | 2007 Nissan 1400 | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Econovan | 1400 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1789 cc | 1397 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 63 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 138 Nm | 97 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2310 mm |