2004 Ford Ecosport vs. 2002 Volvo C70
To start off, 2004 Ford Ecosport is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Volvo C70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Volvo C70 would be higher. At 1,984 cc (5 cylinders), 2002 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volvo C70 (162 HP) has 53 more horse power than 2004 Ford Ecosport. (109 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Ecosport.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Volvo C70 has automatic transmission and 2004 Ford Ecosport has manual transmission. 2004 Ford Ecosport will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Volvo C70 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Ecosport | 2002 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | Ecosport | C70 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1600 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 162 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4228 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1679 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2670 mm |
