2004 Ford Escape vs. 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2004 Ford Escape is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Escape is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Escape (203 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (177 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Escape should accelerate faster than 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 22 kg more than 2004 Ford Escape.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Escape (272 Nm) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (217 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Escape will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Escape | 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Ford | Oldsmobile |
Model | Escape | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2004 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 203 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 272 Nm | 217 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 85 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1443 kg | 1465 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2740 mm |