2004 Ford Escape vs. 2009 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XF is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Escape. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Escape would be higher. Both 2004 Ford Escape and 2009 Jaguar XF are equipped with a 2,967 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XF (235 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2004 Ford Escape. (210 HP @ 6150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Escape. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jaguar XF weights approximately 161 kg more than 2004 Ford Escape. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Jaguar XF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Jaguar XF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Escape, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jaguar XF (293 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Escape. (271 Nm). This means 2009 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Escape.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Escape | 2009 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Escape | XF |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2967 cc | 2967 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 235 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 293 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1518 kg | 1679 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2920 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 10.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 70 L |