2004 Ford Escape vs. 2009 Renault Trafic
To start off, 2009 Renault Trafic is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Escape. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Escape would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Escape is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Escape (203 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 2009 Renault Trafic. (100 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Escape should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Trafic.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Escape (272 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Renault Trafic. (241 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Escape will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Renault Trafic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Escape | 2009 Renault Trafic | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Escape | Trafic |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 203 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 272 Nm | 241 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 93 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 9 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3100 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 90 L |