2004 Ford Escape vs. 2010 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Escape. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Escape would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2004 Ford Escape. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Escape.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (232 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Escape. (162 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Escape.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Escape | 2010 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Ford | Citroen |
Model | Escape | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1987 cc | 2359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 162 Nm | 232 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.8 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |