2004 Ford Escape vs. 2010 Ford E-150
To start off, 2010 Ford E-150 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Escape. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Escape would be higher. At 4,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Escape (203 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2010 Ford E-150. (171 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Escape should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford E-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford E-150 weights approximately 79 kg more than 2004 Ford Escape.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Escape (272 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-150. (232 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Escape will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Escape | 2010 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Escape | E-150 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 203 HP | 171 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 272 Nm | 232 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1443 kg | 1522 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1725 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.4 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 62 L |