2004 Ford Escape vs. 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo
To start off, 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Escape. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Escape would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo weights approximately 11 kg more than 2004 Ford Escape.
Because 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Ford Escape. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo (540 Nm) has 275 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Escape. (265 Nm). This means 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Escape.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Escape | 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo | |
| Make | Ford | Lamborghini |
| Model | Escape | Gallardo |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 8000 RPM |
| Torque | 265 Nm | 540 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 92 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1489 kg | 1500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4345 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1165 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2560 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 9.6 L/100km | 11.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 12.5 L/100km | 18.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 90 L |
