2004 Ford Excursion vs. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Excursion. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Excursion would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Excursion weights approximately 591 kg more than 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom.
Because 2004 Ford Excursion is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Excursion will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom (720 Nm) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Excursion. (576 Nm). This means 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Excursion.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Excursion | 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Excursion | Phantom |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 310 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5350 RPM |
| Torque | 576 Nm | 720 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 84 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 3261 kg | 2670 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5760 mm | 6092 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2050 mm | 1640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3490 mm | 3820 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 167 L | 100 L |
