2004 Ford Expedition vs. 1952 Riley RM A
To start off, 2004 Ford Expedition is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Riley RM A would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Expedition is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Expedition weights approximately 1337 kg more than 1952 Riley RM A.
Because 2004 Ford Expedition is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Expedition will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Ford Expedition has automatic transmission and 1952 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1952 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Ford Expedition will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Expedition | 1952 Riley RM A | |
Make | Ford | Riley |
Model | Expedition | RM A |
Year Released | 2004 | 1952 |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2572 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5230 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2870 mm |