2004 Ford Expedition vs. 1963 Renault 8
To start off, 2004 Ford Expedition is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Renault 8 would be higher. At 4,603 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Expedition is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Expedition (232 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 185 more horse power than 1963 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Expedition should accelerate faster than 1963 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Expedition weights approximately 1627 kg more than 1963 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Expedition | 1963 Renault 8 | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Expedition | 8 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4603 cc | 956 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 232 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2367 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5230 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2280 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 38 L |
