2004 Ford Expedition vs. 2008 Mazda 6
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Expedition. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Expedition would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Expedition is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Expedition (260 HP) has 156 more horse power than 2008 Mazda 6. (104 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Expedition should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda 6.
Because 2004 Ford Expedition is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Expedition will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Expedition (475 Nm) has 330 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda 6. (145 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Expedition will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Expedition | 2008 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Expedition | 6 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 104 HP |
Torque | 475 Nm | 145 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 83.6 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5230 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 55 L |