2004 Ford Expedition vs. 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Expedition. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Expedition would be higher. At 6,208 cc, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Expedition weights approximately 652 kg more than 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS.
Because 2004 Ford Expedition is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Expedition will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS (630 Nm) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Expedition. (476 Nm). This means 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Expedition.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Expedition | 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS | |
Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Expedition | CLS |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 6208 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 476 Nm | 630 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 102.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 94.6 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2572 kg | 1920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5230 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 12 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 80 L |