2004 Ford Explorer vs. 1962 Reliant Sabre Six
To start off, 2004 Ford Explorer is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Explorer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Explorer (239 HP) has 131 more horse power than 1962 Reliant Sabre Six. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Explorer should accelerate faster than 1962 Reliant Sabre Six. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Explorer weights approximately 482 kg more than 1962 Reliant Sabre Six. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Explorer (382 Nm) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Reliant Sabre Six. (185 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Explorer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Reliant Sabre Six.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Explorer | 1962 Reliant Sabre Six | |
| Make | Ford | Reliant |
| Model | Explorer | Sabre Six |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 2553 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 239 HP | 108 HP |
| Torque | 382 Nm | 185 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 8.3:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 816 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1560 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2290 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 38 L |
