2004 Ford Explorer vs. 1963 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2004 Ford Explorer is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Explorer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Explorer (239 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Elan. (100 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Explorer should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Explorer weights approximately 704 kg more than 1963 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Ford Explorer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Explorer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Explorer (382 Nm) has 244 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Lotus Elan. (138 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Explorer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Explorer | 1963 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Ford | Lotus |
| Model | Explorer | Elan |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 239 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 382 Nm | 138 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 81 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 72.7 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 594 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 3700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1150 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2140 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 45 L |
