2004 Ford Explorer vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2004 Ford Explorer is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Explorer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Explorer (239 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Explorer should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Explorer weights approximately 358 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Explorer (382 Nm) has 249 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Explorer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Explorer | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Explorer | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2004 | 1967 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 239 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 382 Nm | 133 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 57 L |