2004 Ford Explorer vs. 1967 NSU Ro 80
To start off, 2004 Ford Explorer is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Explorer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Explorer (239 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1967 NSU Ro 80. (114 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Explorer should accelerate faster than 1967 NSU Ro 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Explorer weights approximately 88 kg more than 1967 NSU Ro 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Explorer (382 Nm) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 NSU Ro 80. (162 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Explorer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 NSU Ro 80.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Explorer | 1967 NSU Ro 80 | |
| Make | Ford | NSU |
| Model | Explorer | Ro 80 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1967 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 2390 cc |
| Horse Power | 239 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 382 Nm | 162 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2870 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 37 L |
