2004 Ford Explorer vs. 1968 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2004 Ford Explorer is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Explorer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Explorer (239 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1968 Lotus Elan. (116 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Explorer should accelerate faster than 1968 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Explorer weights approximately 448 kg more than 1968 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Explorer (382 Nm) has 236 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Lotus Elan. (146 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Explorer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Explorer | 1968 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Ford | Lotus |
| Model | Explorer | Elan |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1968 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1558 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 239 HP | 116 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 382 Nm | 146 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 850 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2440 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 45 L |
