2004 Ford Explorer vs. 2000 Ford Puma
To start off, 2004 Ford Explorer is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Puma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Puma would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Explorer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Explorer (239 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 2000 Ford Puma. (153 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Explorer should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Puma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Explorer weights approximately 23 kg more than 2000 Ford Puma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Explorer (382 Nm) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Puma. (170 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Explorer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Explorer | 2000 Ford Puma | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Explorer | Puma |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1679 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 239 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 382 Nm | 170 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1275 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 42 L |