2004 Ford Explorer vs. 2007 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2007 Jeep Commander is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Explorer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Explorer would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Explorer (239 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2007 Jeep Commander. (228 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Explorer should accelerate faster than 2007 Jeep Commander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1112 kg more than 2004 Ford Explorer.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Jeep Commander (410 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Explorer. (382 Nm). This means 2007 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Explorer.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Explorer | 2007 Jeep Commander | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | Explorer | Commander |
Year Released | 2004 | 2007 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 4701 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 239 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 382 Nm | 410 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 2410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 14.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 78 L |