2004 Ford Explorer vs. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Explorer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Explorer would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Explorer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover (391 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 2004 Ford Explorer. (239 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Explorer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1334 kg more than 2004 Ford Explorer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover (560 Nm) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Explorer. (382 Nm). This means 2009 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Explorer.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Explorer | 2009 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Ford | Land Rover |
Model | Explorer | Range Rover |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 4197 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 239 HP | 391 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 382 Nm | 560 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.1:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 2632 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2200 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 16.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 88 L |