2004 Ford Explorer vs. 2010 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 2010 Dodge Challenger is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Explorer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Explorer would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Challenger (372 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 2004 Ford Explorer. (239 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Explorer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 535 kg more than 2004 Ford Explorer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Dodge Challenger (542 Nm) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Explorer. (382 Nm). This means 2010 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Explorer.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Explorer | 2010 Dodge Challenger | |
Make | Ford | Dodge |
Model | Explorer | Challenger |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 239 HP | 372 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 382 Nm | 542 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1833 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 5022 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1923 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2946 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.8 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 72 L |