2004 Ford Explorer vs. 2012 Tata Nano
To start off, 2012 Tata Nano is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Explorer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Explorer would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Explorer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Explorer (239 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 204 more horse power than 2012 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Explorer should accelerate faster than 2012 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Explorer weights approximately 698 kg more than 2012 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Explorer (382 Nm) has 334 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Tata Nano. (48 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Explorer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Tata Nano.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Explorer | 2012 Tata Nano | |
| Make | Ford | Tata |
| Model | Explorer | Nano |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 624 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 239 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 382 Nm | 48 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 3099 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1495 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1652 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2230 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 4.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 37 L |
