2004 Ford F-150 vs. 1965 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2004 Ford F-150 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 4,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford F-150 (200 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford F-150 weights approximately 1225 kg more than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Ford F-150. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford F-150 | 1965 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | F-150 | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4196 cc | 1189 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5380 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2290 mm |
