2004 Ford F-150 vs. 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2004 Ford F-150 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 7,462 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass (248 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2004 Ford F-150. (231 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford F-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford F-150 weights approximately 414 kg more than 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2004 Ford F-150 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford F-150 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass (502 Nm) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford F-150. (398 Nm). This means 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford F-150.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford F-150 | 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Ford | Oldsmobile |
| Model | F-150 | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 7462 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 231 HP | 248 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 398 Nm | 502 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2214 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6210 mm | 5270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 4000 mm | 2850 mm |
