2004 Ford F-150 vs. 1976 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 2004 Ford F-150 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford F-150 (203 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1976 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda RX-2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford F-150 weights approximately 877 kg more than 1976 Mazda RX-2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford F-150 (343 Nm) has 186 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm). This means 2004 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford F-150 | 1976 Mazda RX-2 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | F-150 | RX-2 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2292 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 203 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 343 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1837 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2480 mm |
