2004 Ford F-150 vs. 2005 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2005 Jaguar XK is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford F-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford F-150 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XK (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 187 more horse power than 2004 Ford F-150. (203 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford F-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford F-150 weights approximately 84 kg more than 2005 Jaguar XK.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar XK (553 Nm) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford F-150. (343 Nm). This means 2005 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford F-150.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford F-150 | 2005 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | F-150 | XK |
Year Released | 2004 | 2005 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 4196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 203 HP | 390 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 343 Nm | 553 Nm |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1837 kg | 1753 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2590 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.8 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 75 L |