2004 Ford F-150 vs. 2005 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2005 Toyota Tundra is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford F-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford F-150 would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford F-150 (380 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 2005 Toyota Tundra. (282 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota Tundra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 705 kg more than 2004 Ford F-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford F-150 (610 Nm) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota Tundra. (430 Nm). This means 2004 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota Tundra.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford F-150 | 2005 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | F-150 | Tundra |
Year Released | 2004 | 2005 |
Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5407 cc | 4671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 380 HP | 282 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Torque | 610 Nm | 430 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.4:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1323 kg | 2028 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5290 mm | 5550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 3270 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 14.7 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 16.8 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 100 L |