2004 Ford F-150 vs. 2006 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2006 Jeep Commander is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford F-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford F-150 would be higher. At 4,703 cc, 2006 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jeep Commander (235 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2004 Ford F-150. (231 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford F-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford F-150 weights approximately 537 kg more than 2006 Jeep Commander.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jeep Commander (414 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford F-150. (398 Nm). This means 2006 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford F-150.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford F-150 | 2006 Jeep Commander | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | F-150 | Commander |
Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 4703 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 231 HP | 235 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 398 Nm | 414 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 101 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2214 kg | 1677 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6210 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 4000 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 114 L | 78 L |