2004 Ford F-150 vs. 2008 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford F-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford F-150 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Commander (215 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2004 Ford F-150. (203 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford F-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 518 kg more than 2004 Ford F-150. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Commander (510 Nm) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford F-150. (343 Nm). This means 2008 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford F-150.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford F-150 | 2008 Jeep Commander | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | F-150 | Commander |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2985 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 203 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 343 Nm | 510 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 97 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95 mm | 92 mm |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1837 kg | 2355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 10.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 80 L |