2004 Ford F-150 vs. 2008 Mitsubishi Endeavor
To start off, 2008 Mitsubishi Endeavor is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford F-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford F-150 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mitsubishi Endeavor (225 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2004 Ford F-150. (203 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mitsubishi Endeavor should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford F-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford F-150 weights approximately 295 kg more than 2008 Mitsubishi Endeavor.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mitsubishi Endeavor (346 Nm) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford F-150. (343 Nm). This means 2008 Mitsubishi Endeavor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford F-150.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford F-150 | 2008 Mitsubishi Endeavor | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | F-150 | Endeavor |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 3828 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 203 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 343 Nm | 346 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1837 kg | 1542 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 11.8 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 81 L |
