2004 Ford F-150 vs. 2008 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford F-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford F-150 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Rover 75 (257 HP) has 54 more horse power than 2004 Ford F-150. (203 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford F-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford F-150 weights approximately 422 kg more than 2008 Rover 75.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford F-150 (343 Nm) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Rover 75. (245 Nm). This means 2004 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford F-150 | 2008 Rover 75 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | F-150 | 75 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 203 HP | 257 HP |
Torque | 343 Nm | 245 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 97 mm | 90.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95 mm | 90 mm |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1837 kg | 1415 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 13.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 65 L |