2004 Ford F-150 vs. 2009 Mazda 2
To start off, 2009 Mazda 2 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford F-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford F-150 would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford F-150 (380 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 313 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 2. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 2 weights approximately 6 kg more than 2004 Ford F-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford F-150 (610 Nm) has 450 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 2. (160 Nm). This means 2004 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford F-150 | 2009 Mazda 2 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | F-150 | 2 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5407 cc | 1399 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 380 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 610 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 73.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.4:1 | 18.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1323 kg | 1329 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5290 mm | 3930 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2500 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 16.8 L/100km | 4.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 45 L |
