2004 Ford F-150 vs. 2010 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2010 Nissan Micra is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford F-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford F-150 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford F-150 (203 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 2010 Nissan Micra. (81 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan Micra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford F-150 weights approximately 788 kg more than 2010 Nissan Micra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford F-150 (343 Nm) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Nissan Micra. (185 Nm). This means 2004 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford F-150 | 2010 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | F-150 | Micra |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 203 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 343 Nm | 185 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 97 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95 mm | 80.5 mm |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1837 kg | 1049 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 3720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 4.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 46 L |