2004 Ford F-150 vs. 2010 Toyota Land Cruiser
To start off, 2010 Toyota Land Cruiser is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford F-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford F-150 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Land Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Land Cruiser (381 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 2004 Ford F-150. (203 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Land Cruiser should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford F-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota Land Cruiser weights approximately 743 kg more than 2004 Ford F-150. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Toyota Land Cruiser (543 Nm) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford F-150. (343 Nm). This means 2010 Toyota Land Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford F-150.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford F-150 | 2010 Toyota Land Cruiser | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | F-150 | Land Cruiser |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 203 HP | 381 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 343 Nm | 543 Nm |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1837 kg | 2580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1971 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 11.8 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 93 L |