2004 Ford F-150 vs. 2010 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2010 Volvo XC90 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford F-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford F-150 would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford F-150 (380 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 2010 Volvo XC90. (235 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 2010 Volvo XC90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 832 kg more than 2004 Ford F-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford F-150 (610 Nm) has 290 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Volvo XC90. (320 Nm). This means 2004 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Volvo XC90.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford F-150 | 2010 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | F-150 | XC90 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5407 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 380 HP | 235 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 610 Nm | 320 Nm |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1323 kg | 2155 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5290 mm | 4808 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1897 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1783 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 14.7 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 80 L |