2004 Ford F-150 vs. 2012 Acura MDX
To start off, 2012 Acura MDX is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford F-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford F-150 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Acura MDX (300 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2004 Ford F-150. (231 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Acura MDX should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford F-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford F-150 weights approximately 150 kg more than 2012 Acura MDX.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford F-150 (398 Nm) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Acura MDX. (366 Nm). This means 2004 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Acura MDX.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford F-150 | 2012 Acura MDX | |
Make | Ford | Acura |
Model | F-150 | MDX |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 231 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 398 Nm | 366 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2214 kg | 2064 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6210 mm | 4867 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1994 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1732 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 4000 mm | 2751 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 114 L | 79 L |