2004 Ford F-150 vs. 2012 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2012 Toyota Matrix is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford F-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford F-150 would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford F-150 (380 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 222 more horse power than 2012 Toyota Matrix. (158 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 2012 Toyota Matrix.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford F-150 (610 Nm) has 391 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Toyota Matrix. (219 Nm). This means 2004 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford F-150 | 2012 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | F-150 | Matrix |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5407 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 380 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 610 Nm | 219 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1765 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1549 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2601 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 14.7 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 50 L |
