2004 Ford F-150 vs. 2013 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford F-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford F-150 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro (420 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2004 Ford F-150. (380 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford F-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford F-150 (610 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Chevrolet Camaro. (569 Nm). This means 2004 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford F-150 | 2013 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Ford | Chevrolet |
| Model | F-150 | Camaro |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5407 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 380 HP | 420 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5900 RPM |
| Torque | 610 Nm | 569 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 103 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.4:1 | 10.7 |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5290 mm | 4836 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1918 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1377 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2852 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 14.7 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 16.8 L/100km | 12.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 72 L |
