2004 Ford F-150 vs. 2013 Lincoln MKT
To start off, 2013 Lincoln MKT is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford F-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford F-150 would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford F-150 (380 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2013 Lincoln MKT. (360 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 2013 Lincoln MKT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Lincoln MKT weights approximately 953 kg more than 2004 Ford F-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford F-150 (610 Nm) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Lincoln MKT. (475 Nm). This means 2004 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Lincoln MKT.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford F-150 | 2013 Lincoln MKT | |
Make | Ford | Lincoln |
Model | F-150 | MKT |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5407 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 380 HP | 360 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 610 Nm | 475 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.4:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1323 kg | 2276 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5290 mm | 5273 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2177 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1712 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2995 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 14.7 L/100km | 8.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 70 L |