2004 Ford F-150 vs. 2013 Nissan Juke
To start off, 2013 Nissan Juke is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford F-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford F-150 would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford F-150 (380 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 195 more horse power than 2013 Nissan Juke. (185 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 2013 Nissan Juke. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Nissan Juke weights approximately 107 kg more than 2004 Ford F-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford F-150 (610 Nm) has 370 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Nissan Juke. (240 Nm). This means 2004 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Nissan Juke.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford F-150 | 2013 Nissan Juke | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | F-150 | Juke |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5407 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 380 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 610 Nm | 240 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 81 mm |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1323 kg | 1430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5290 mm | 4125 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 14.7 L/100km | 6.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 45 L |