2004 Ford F-250 vs. 1982 Mazda 626
To start off, 2004 Ford F-250 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford F-250 weights approximately 1894 kg more than 1982 Mazda 626.
Because 2004 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Mazda 626. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford F-250 | 1982 Mazda 626 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | F-250 | 626 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5408 cc | 1586 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 260 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2939 kg | 1045 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6250 mm | 4310 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3970 mm | 2520 mm |
