2004 Ford F-250 vs. 2007 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2007 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford F-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford F-250 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford F-250 (260 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2007 Mazda RX-8. (232 HP @ 8500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 2007 Mazda RX-8.
Because 2004 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 Mazda RX-8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford F-250 (476 Nm) has 260 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Mazda RX-8. (216 Nm). This means 2004 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford F-250 | 2007 Mazda RX-8 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | F-250 | RX-8 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2007 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5408 cc | 1308 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 260 HP | 232 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 8500 RPM |
| Torque | 476 Nm | 216 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 73 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 85 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 6250 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3970 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 110 L | 60 L |
