2004 Ford F-250 vs. 2012 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford F-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford F-250 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford F-250 weights approximately 1488 kg more than 2012 Volvo C30.
Because 2004 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Volvo C30. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford F-250 (476 Nm) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Volvo C30. (400 Nm). This means 2004 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Volvo C30.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford F-250 | 2012 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | F-250 | C30 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5408 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 260 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 476 Nm | 400 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2939 kg | 1451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6250 mm | 4252 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1783 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1448 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3970 mm | 2639 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 110 L | 60 L |
